Read the essay here!
By Clare Hickey
Clare Hickey: Congratulations on your essay “I Am No Beekeeper.” It’s been out for a little while now, but it just won Notable in Best American Essays. Has your relationship to the story changed at all since writing it or publishing it?
Arya Samuelson: Yes, definitely! I just read the essay a few weeks ago as part of a performance piece, so it’s fascinating to kind of relive that story all over again – especially with the recent Best American Essays nod. One of the really beautiful things about having this story in the world has been hearing people’s responses. Many people have shared about their own abortion experiences, some of which shared deep parallels to mine and some of which were completely different, but all of which carried a similar kind of lingering potency, especially because we had been carrying these stories in secret.
Since publication, I’ve had the pleasure of being invited into many reading and collaboration spaces centered around subversive motherhood. It’s been so powerful to witness such a spectrum of experiences surrounding the complexities of motherhood and to deliberately bring abortion into that conversation.
I wrote the essay while I was at the artist residency and living out the experience in real time, so there’s a lot that has changed for me since writing it. I’m actually working on a sequel right now that
is all about rocks and rage and ritual. The essay takes on the question of how to memorialize my abortion, as in, how to create a “remembering space” out of it. The story picks up exactly a year after the abortion and explores how I’ve struggled & experimented with how to commemorate something that I absolutely don’t regret. Rocks – and their infinite view on history – have been a big ally to me through this process. Through sharing this essay out in the world, I’ve also learned how many people have created their own abortion rituals, and how all of us are doing this in the dark, without knowing how un-alone we are.
CH: What was it like to read your own work for an audience?
AS: I actually love reading work out loud! I was originally trained as a singer, so music is a huge part of my approach to language and how I think about phrasing and how I want it to feel and resonate. I think there’s so much power in getting to feel how something lands in a room… I often feel more satisfied reading a piece of work out loud for an audience than publishing it.
CH: I read it again right before our call and it almost struck me as a coming of age story. You come to a lot of realizations about yourself and other people during the story and the way the past impacts your future. Did you feel like it was a coming of age story at all?
AS: I don’t know if I would have called it that, but what I can say is that the experience was deeply transformative in ways that I’m still reckoning with. While I was writing the first draft of the essay, I was just starting out at the residency, where there was mold everywhere, and I was so sad and lonely. It was excruciating, and at the same time, it was ecstatic. I was in such a broken-open place that I was flooded with language everywhere I went. It was so intense and exhausting and yet also life-affirming. I don’t wish I could relive that month, but there’s something I miss about that kind of intensity. I knew that I was exactly where I was supposed to be. One of the greatest gifts that the abortion gave me – and writing this story – was a greater ability to hold paradox: to hold the life inside of death, to hold the grief of a choice without regret, and the light that is always somehow available in darkness.
CH: Could I ask you about your process?
AS: It started the way that it happened in the essay, with the housemate begging me to collaborate. When I went back to my room, I just tried to dredge up anything I could about bees. I did some research and some freewriting, but it seemed like a dead end. Still, something about the idea of bees and abortion lingered with me. Bees represent fertility, and abortion is, well, the opposite, so there was a kind of friction between these two ideas – or a buzz! – that felt compelling to me. So I knew there was something to this idea, but I still wasn’t sure what it was. Then I started researching more about bees and discovering how they’ve always been associated, not just with fertility, but also with death and grieving and rebirth. Meanwhile, I kept writing about all the grief that was alive for me at the time – the broken engagement, the death of a relationship that was never going to work, the dying leaves all around me – and then cobbled together the first, barely-strung together draft.
The first draft of the essay wasn’t set at the artist residency. It was basically a lot of different ideas that were placed next to each other, without any scenes to orient or ground the reader. My readers suggested that maybe the story could be set at the residency and played out over the course of the month I was living there. I was initially a bit reluctant about this idea, because I thought that hearing about life at an artist residency might not relate for a reader and might come off like a rarified, insular experience. But I tried it out, and it instantly delivered a new kind of warmth to the story – more glow and humor and tenderness. I found that I loved bringing these women to life and this place that we all lived in together. In retrospect, I don’t know how else this story could have been told. It became a tribute to them.
CH: You touched on it briefly with writing about the other women in the residency. How do you find the experience of writing about other people?
AS: This is one of the biggest questions that nonfiction writers get asked and have to contend with. I have many thoughts about it! In terms of this piece, I didn’t particularly struggle with writing about my mom or my exes. I think that’s because I was writing more about the grief and pain and love that I associated with them, rather than writing about any anger I carried towards them. That would have been a lot harder.
What did surprise me was how scared I was to send the published essay to the women at the residency, because I worried they might feel a little invaded by being included. They knew I was working on something about abortion while I was there, but I don’t think they expected to be part of it. Thankfully, they’ve actually been quite gracious about it, and the nocturnal bee painter has shared it with basically everyone she knows! I’m grateful that these women are still part of my life.
CH: There’s a lot of beautiful vulnerability in this essay. You’ll also write fiction. How do you find the differences in vulnerability between the two genres?
AS: To me, the challenge of nonfiction is to find the story. We are working with so much raw material – every association and memory of our lives – but from there, we have to figure out what is and isn’t important and carve out the particular story that we’re trying to tell. This can take a very long time.
With nonfiction, I love how I always get to discover new things. Nonfiction gives me a chance to take all the things I thought were true – about myself, about my life, about what I’ve been through – and to dig deeper and deeper until I’ve come to totally understand them anew. To me, that’s the ultimate pleasure, that discovery and surprise. That’s what keeps me coming back to writing.
When I’m writing nonfiction, I feel myself changing as the story evolves. The process requires turning the subconscious conscious and I find this glorious. But fiction lives on a more subconscious level. I have a novel that I’ve been working on for 5+ years, and I’m still constantly discovering, for example, that a character reminds me of my father or my childhood best friend. It’s like, Really? It took me 5 years to realize that? There is something so mysterious about fiction that is both magical and maddening.
CH: Did you feel more catharsis in writing the essay, or in the response you’ve gotten with shared experiences about abortion?
AS: Writing this essay during the residency felt like a lifeline. It was wild to feel simultaneously so broken and consumed with creativity. I don’t believe that the tortured artist trope is at all what we should be aspiring to – I believe in art coming from a place that can sustain joy and be made in a way that supports all of our other endeavors – but this just happened to be the way everything went down. Writing this essay at that particular moment connected me to a larger sense of possibility when so many doors had just closed. It kept me tethered to hope, which is why I say that, to me, art is almost religious. Hearing about how people have connected with the essay has also been deeply impactful– not out of a need for anyone’s approval, but because it’s life-affirming to feel connected through our most intimate truths.
CH: In the act of writing it did you know it would become that lifeline for you or was that a surprising accomplishment?
AS: I knew it would become something. My greatest maturing as a writer over the last ten years has been trusting myself more and more. I trust my process. I trust that the story always comes in time. I trust when there’s something that I think is connected, it is connected, and it’ll probably take me years to figure out how to connect the dots for anybody else, but I trust that I’m onto something.”
Clare Hickey is a NOR intern studying English Literature and Writing at Ohio University.